Skip to main content

Some times Learning and Development doesn't fit.



Sometimes Learning and Development doesn't fit.

It's time for a rant.

I know that I am an L&D professional and this post may seem counter intuitive, but L&D needs to step up and claim its place in the business.

Why do most businesses completely miss the opportunities Learning & Development bring in the modern age?

It's probably because L&D in most small to medium sized businesses and some less enlightened large businesses and major corporations is still the little backwater to provide training when managers deem it the right solution.

We all hear that learning professionals need to adapt to business, talk in business terms, curate content and so on. Isn't L&D supposed to help the business to resolve its issues? So why, oh why does business, and to a degree L&D itself always fall back to "What TRAINING do you need?"

We are surely, or at least we should be, way past this by now. We all know tL&D professionals are supposed to ask lots of questions as to the whys and wherefore when they are approached to help with an issue, but in reality how many just give in and say "Okay, here's a good training course for you."

I believe that there is a lot more emphasis put on the Learning (training) aspect of the title, and Development is only seen as a people element of the learning process.

If we are to be taken seriously, then we need to spend more of our time viewing the Development side of our role more holistically.

What do I mean? We all hear the term Performance Consultant which is starting to replace L&D consultant. Exactly what is the difference? I don't think there is much, it's just a new name for the same function: to provide employees with the tools, support and content to have a positive effect on the way they perform their job.

But what if the problem is not the person? What does L&D do then? In my experience it is not normally involved. Have you ever turned round and told management that it not an L&D solution that is needed for the issue and that the process, application, software or environment is wrong? For example here is a typical diagnostic.

L&D normally concerns itself only with the people element. However, it clearly has an effect on all the other elements and must be included in the decision making when change happens.

We need to be braver so that we can close the gap between issue and right solution: offer support to managers and provide evidence that other elements could work better first, followed by any associated learning.

Learning & Development is not just about training programmes: it is there to develop the company and not just the people.


Les Heath

Learning & Development Strategy Implementation Specialist


Interested in what else I do? Follow this link www.nutshelllnd.co.uk 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Learning & Development for SMEs - Part 1 of 6 - Make a Difference

  Small businesses may not have the resources or budget of their larger counterparts for learning and development activities, but that doesn’t mean they should simply ignore it. The most recent report (2017) from the Federation of Small Businesses indicates that while 91% of small businesses recognise the value of staff training and development, both in terms of increasing the value of an employee’s contribution to the business and in terms of employee retention, just 43% of British SMEs are currently investing in training and development. The cost of providing training was cited as the primary reason small businesses don’t offer their staff a training and development programme, with 43% identifying this as an issue. 34% of the businesses surveyed by the FSB indicated that they don’t provide training because they don’t have access to relevant training options in their area. So, you’re responsible for your small to medium sized company’s employee development...

Learning & Development for SMEs - Part 3 - Leadership

  A business cannot become one in which learning is continuous and part of the business culture without direction and support from the top down Understand your company needs Ask yourself a question: Does L&D speak the same language as the business? Every department has its own language, buzz words, terminology and we within learning and development as guilty as everyone else. So instead of talking to them about 70/20/10 models, Kirkpatrick evaluations, working out loud or blended learning speak to them in language they will understand. Likewise, learning a little bit of their language and embedding it in your L&D dictionary will go a long way to building mutual trust. We have, as L&D practitioners, historically been focused on “Event” learning. In the world of the business executive the type and number of courses run is to some extent irrelevant. That is why we need to change the way we think; to look at L&D through “executive” eyes and start concentration on p...